Of course the effects and mix are going to be different, and some of the sounds are closer than others, but whatever. In any event, I think I got pretty close with my rendition. Of course, there's also the snare, which was an 808. Also, the string line toward the end of the song sounds like it might have been played on a polysynth, ie maybe the Jupiter 4 which Vince used alot at the time. I don't think Vince had his Fairlight yet, otherwise I'd say it was that. The "Tinkle" sound, for instance, sounds more bell-like on the original, so it could possibly have been something like a PPG. Having done so, I'm not convinced that every single sound on the original is actually a Pro-One. I found that all of the patches from the article needed adjusting to get them in the ballpark, plus I had to create the other sounds from scratch (I've credited each patch accordingly). Then I had to dial in all the Pro-One sounds one-by-one and record each part via a Kenton MIDI-CV interface. ), I figured I'd have a go at re-creating it.įirst I transcribed the music (sequenced with Cubase), using soft-synth sounds as temporary stand-ins for the Pro-One. So, since I have a Pro-One, and there are scans of an old music magazine article online which show the settings for some of the sounds Vince used on this track (. The original is well-known by synth nerds as having been produced by Vince Clarke using only a Sequential Circuits Pro-One monophonic analog synthesizer. "Some friends needed the backing track of this song for their wedding, so I took the opportunity to geek out with it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |